Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

India unequivocally rejects involvement at Bagram base in Afghanistan

 


Recent social-media speculation suggested that Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan might host a presence of India either through direct access or logistical cooperation. However, Afghan officials have categorically rejected these reports. Kabul has stated that India has neither sought nor been offered any presence at the base, describing all such online claims as “baseless” and seemingly designed to undermine the relationship between the two nations.  

Kabul’s Public Position on Foreign Military Presence

The Afghan Foreign Minister, Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi, during his visit to New Delhi, reaffirmed that Afghanistan will not allow any foreign military presence at Bagram. He emphasised that Afghanistan remains a sovereign state and any engagement must be strictly diplomatic and civilian in nature.   This strongly undercuts the narrative that India might be negotiating for a foothold at the base.

Why the Rumours Gained Traction

Analysts point to a number of factors behind the emergence of these rumours. One key trigger: India’s recent draw-down of its logistical role at the Ayni Air Base in Tajikistan, which it had helped refurbish decades earlier. That move sparked speculation that India might seek an alternate location, possibly in Afghanistan.   Meanwhile, Bagram remains symbolically and strategically significant: located roughly 60 km north of Kabul, it served for years as the hub of U.S. and NATO operations, and has a deep logistic network and twin runways originally developed under Soviet and then U.S. control.  

India’s Actual Policy and Engagement with Afghanistan

India’s official engagement with Afghanistan continues to be anchored in developmental and humanitarian support rather than military alignment. New Delhi has emphasised its focus on schools, health infrastructure, food-aid, and people-to-people links. Any suggestion of military use of Afghan facilities would conflict with India’s stated posture and risk straining its relationships across the region with powers such as Russia, Iran and the Central Asian republics.   Moreover, India recently announced the upgrade of its technical mission in Kabul to a full embassy, signalling deeper diplomatic and economic engagement.  

Regional Strategic Context and Why the Issue Matters

The swirl of speculation around Bagram also reflects broader geopolitical undercurrents. The base is attractive to many given its location near the Hindu Kush and reach into Central and South Asia. Meanwhile, other regional actors including Pakistan have their own interest in ensuring access or influence there. Some sources suggest that U.S. interest in resuming operational access to Bagram may have spurred discussions, and that Pakistan’s military establishment might have influenced those calculations.  In this light, India’s clear distancing from military presence at Bagram helps preserve its flexibility and avoid being drawn into a harder-militarised regional competition.

What This Means and Key Takeaways

In plain terms, here are the main conclusions:

The rumours of India having or negotiating a presence at Bagram are false, according to Afghan officials.

Afghanistan is committed to keeping foreign military bases off its soil, at least in the case of Bagram.

India’s policy remains one of diplomatic, developmental, and humanitarian engagement  not military access or bases.

The speculation was likely driven by regional strategic anxieties and shifts (Tajikistan base exit, U.S. interest in Bagram, Pakistan’s posture) rather than any concrete Indian plan.

For India, this clarification helps it maintain relationships across a complex regional field balancing ties with Iran, Russia, Central Asia, and managing tensions with Pakistan and China.

 


Post a Comment

0 Comments